202 link should be farther west

West Valley View
3/10/2006

Editor:
While reading the article by John Machay on March 7 concerning the I-10/202 freeway connection, I began to wonder if people are grasping the “realistic” 202 functions and its growth ramifications. Controversy is coming from emotional knee-jerk reactions of potentially displaced homeowners and businesses. Wherever placed, families will be moved and jobs relocated. The good of all and potential use should be the deciding factors.

In western Maricopa County, unlimited growth is scheduled and unstoppable expansion projected. In the last three years, home and commercial construction permits were approved in record numbers. West Valley cities are surpassing the once unstoppable Southeast Valley. Planned growth west of the I-10/101 interchange is mind-boggling.

Practical reasons of function should be the parameters in which the 202 placement is predicated. By strategically linking west to east, there would be positive impact on the negative traffic patterns already on the I-10. Every West Valley resident, be it family or business, would see vast improvement in I-10 traffic by placing the connection with the 202 freeway in alignment with the 101 interchange.

Anyone living in Phoenix realizes that ADOT and politicians are not quick responders to growth forecasts. Years ago, who would have thought that 55th and 71st avenues would be considered a “central” location? These proposals where ADOT’s original choices in 1988, almost 20 years ago. Old forecasts have been outgrown. Connecting the freeways at either junctures would defeat its purpose.

The I-10 is greatly used as a commercial trucking lane. The further west we are able to funnel traffic flow to the proposed 202 freeway, the better its purpose would be in traffic congestion relief. Additional benefits of a safer and more efficient traffic flow would also be created in conjunction while preparing for the onslaught of anticipated westward growth.

Bruce Davies, Avondale